Can we ever make amends?

Can we ever make amends?

A 1946 nuclear test at Bikini Atoll • US Department of Defense (Public Domain)

Originally published 23 November 1998

A decade ago, land­scape pho­tog­ra­ph­er Peter Goin was grant­ed access to sev­er­al of Amer­i­ca’s most restrict­ed nuclear weapons facil­i­ties. His vis­its result­ed in a haunt­ing book of col­or pho­tographs called Nuclear Land­scapes.

The 570-square-mile Han­ford Nuclear Reser­va­tion in Wash­ing­ton State is one of the land­scapes record­ed by Goin. This was a fruit­ful farm­ing region before the gov­ern­ment took it over in 1943, as part of the Man­hat­tan Project, to build the world’s first large-scale nuclear reactor.

Eigh­teen months after con­struc­tion began, the Han­ford reac­tor was pro­duc­ing plu­to­ni­um. Less than a year lat­er, a bomb con­tain­ing Han­ford plu­to­ni­um was explod­ed at Alam­ogor­do, New Mex­i­co, ush­er­ing in the atom­ic age.

Even­tu­al­ly, nine plu­to­ni­um-pro­duc­ing reac­tors were built at Han­ford. Eight were shut down in the 1960s. The reser­va­tion is today most­ly a vast bur­ial ground for radioac­tive waste.

The earth at Han­ford con­tains tens of mil­lions of cubic feet of nuclear waste mate­ri­als, and as much as 100 times that much con­t­a­m­i­nat­ed soil. Enough liq­uid wastes were dis­charged to the envi­ron­ment from the Han­ford plants to cov­er Man­hat­tan to a depth of 40 feet.

More than a half-mil­lion curies of radioac­tive iodine-131 were released into the atmos­phere at Han­ford between 1944 and 1957. By con­trast, the major nuclear acci­dent at Three Mile Island in Penn­syl­va­nia in 1979 released about 20 curies of radioactivity.

These dire poi­sons are invis­i­ble in Goin’s pho­tographs, but crum­bling con­crete bunkers, ghost­ly decom­mis­sioned reac­tors, scum­my stand­ing water of waste dis­pos­al ponds, rusty waste reten­tion tanks, and thou­sands of acres of bar­ren “bur­ial grounds” are tes­ti­mo­ny to the obscene des­e­cra­tion of nature he chron­i­cled in Nuclear Land­scapes (pub­lished by Johns Hop­kins Uni­ver­si­ty Press in 1991).

Goin also vis­it­ed the weapons test sites in Neva­da and on the Biki­ni and Eni­we­tok atolls in the Pacific.

The Neva­da site cov­ers an area larg­er than Rhode Island on the bound­ary between the Mohave and Great Basin deserts. By gov­ern­ment def­i­n­i­tion this was “waste­land,” and there­fore appro­pri­ate for the test­ing of nuclear weapons. Ecol­o­gists know the desert has its own pre­cious flo­ra and fauna.

Between 1950 and 1992, approx­i­mate­ly a thou­sand weapons were explod­ed at the Neva­da site, above and below ground. In one par­tic­u­lar­ly bizarre test, 111 pigs were lined up in zip­pered gar­ments at var­i­ous dis­tances from ground zero and exposed to an above-ground det­o­na­tion. Sev­en­ty-two pigs died imme­di­ate­ly, but the gov­ern­ment gar­nered what it deemed to be impor­tant data on the ther­mal prop­er­ties of mil­i­tary uniforms.

Of course, we should remem­ber that humans were also exposed to the tests.

Goin’s pho­tographs of the Neva­da test site show a land­scape of rust and des­o­la­tion, ground pocked with craters, con­crete roads to nowhere, and a spooky rem­nant of a “doom town” built to test the effects of blast on homes, office build­ings and fall­out shelters.

The Neva­da site is too pro­found­ly con­t­a­m­i­nat­ed for fea­si­ble cleanup, and will remain poi­soned far into the future.

In some ways, the most affect­ing of Goin’s pho­tographs are those of the Biki­ni and Eni­we­tok Atolls, for­mer­ly par­adis­al in their trop­i­cal beau­ty. In the pho­tographs, crum­bling con­crete bunkers and rust­ing tanks are mute mon­u­ments to poi­soned earth and water.

Although no tests have been held in the islands since 1958, the land­scape and its native peo­ple remain scarred by nuclear trauma.

Can humankind ever make amends?

Many of Amer­i­ca’s nuclear facil­i­ties are sur­round­ed by gov­ern­ment-owned secu­ri­ty buffer zones of most­ly untouched nat­ur­al habi­tats. Begin­ning in 1972, the Atom­ic Ener­gy Com­mis­sion set aside some of these unused acres as wildlife and ecol­o­gy research refuges, called Nation­al Envi­ron­men­tal Research Parks. Sev­en such parks were estab­lished to pro­mote “research and edu­ca­tion in the envi­ron­men­tal sciences.”

These parks have become invalu­able out­door lab­o­ra­to­ries for sci­en­tif­ic field work on every­thing from cli­mate change to nutri­ent cycling in soils.

Today, the US Depart­ment of Ener­gy has respon­si­bil­i­ty for nuclear facil­i­ties, includ­ing the buffer-zone refuges. Accord­ing to a recent report in the jour­nal Sci­ence, the depart­ment has been qui­et­ly divest­ing itself of research parks land around facil­i­ties at Oak Ridge, Ten­nessee, Ida­ho Falls, Ida­ho, and Rich­mond, Wash­ing­ton, wilder­ness tracts no longer deemed essen­tial to safe­guard­ing the secu­ri­ty of the labs.

The land has been trans­ferred to local gov­ern­ments and the US Bureau of Land Man­age­ment, which in turn have sold much of it to devel­op­ers for house lots, land­fills, and com­mer­cial construction.

Anoth­er 500 square miles of land may soon go on the auc­tion block, accord­ing to Sci­ence. Research parks land at oth­er facil­i­ties, such as Fer­mi­lab in Illi­nois and the Savan­nah Riv­er Site in South Car­oli­na, may also be at risk.

So far, the num­ber of acres involved in these trans­fers is not great com­pared to the huge tracts of earth poi­soned by weapons pro­duc­tion and test­ing over the past half-cen­tu­ry. But their sym­bol­ic sig­nif­i­cance as repa­ra­tion for decades of land­scape abuse can­not be overstated.

The Nation­al Envi­ron­men­tal Research Parks should be metic­u­lous­ly pre­served for the nation as places were ecol­o­gists and wildlife man­agers can learn and prac­tice their trades, and where peo­ple of future gen­er­a­tions can expe­ri­ence wild­ness — a small ges­ture of apol­o­gy to the wound­ed gods of earth, life, water, air.

Share this Musing: