The end: clearer but not nearer

The end: clearer but not nearer

Photo by Adrien Olichon from Pexels

Originally published 12 January 1998

Sci­en­tists are pret­ty sure how the uni­verse began. They are less cer­tain how it will end.

The begin­ning was explo­sive. The uni­verse had its ori­gin about 15 bil­lion years ago in an expand­ing fire­ball of radi­ant ener­gy. Space and time unfurled from a tiny seed of infi­nite ener­gy, like a bal­loon inflat­ing from noth­ing, cool­ing as it swelled. Ener­gy became mat­ter; mat­ter became stars and galax­ies, rac­ing outwards.

Today the galax­ies con­tin­ue to fly apart, impelled by their ini­tial impe­tus, bear­ing the Milky Way and oth­er galax­ies to ever greater separations.

The evi­dence for an explo­sive begin­ning is var­i­ous and com­pelling. First, the present out­rush of the galax­ies sug­gests that they were clos­er in the past, and on top of each oth­er about 15 bil­lion years ago.

Cal­cu­la­tions based on a Big Bang begin­ning neat­ly account for the present abun­dances of ele­ments in the uni­verse: how much hydro­gen, heli­um, and so forth, rel­a­tive to each other.

The far­away quasars give a glimpse of the vio­lent for­ma­tion of the galax­ies. And in every direc­tion, uni­form­ly, our tele­scopes see the after­glow of the Big Bang, the blind­ing light of the begin­ning stretched almost imper­cep­ti­bly thin, in pre­cise agree­ment with calculations.

Less clear is where the uni­verse will go from here.

There are two pos­si­bil­i­ties: Either the uni­verse will expand for­ev­er, car­ry­ing the galax­ies always far­ther apart, into cold and dark­ness, infi­nite­ly dis­persed; or it will cease expand­ing and begin to con­tract, the galax­ies draw­ing clos­er and clos­er, end­ing as it began in a blaze of radi­ant energy.

A whim­per or a bang? A ter­mi­nal glide into Sty­gian gloom, or anni­hi­la­tion in blind­ing light?

Which it will be depends upon the present veloc­i­ty of the galax­ies rel­a­tive to each oth­er, and how much grav­i­ty is work­ing to slow down the expansion.

The sit­u­a­tion is rather like shoot­ing a pro­jec­tile up in the air: Will it climb for­ev­er, escap­ing the grav­i­ta­tion­al pull of the Earth? Or will it slow to an instan­ta­neous stop, then fall back to Earth, gath­er­ing speed?

It all depends on whether the ini­tial veloc­i­ty of the pro­jec­tile imparts suf­fi­cient ener­gy to over­come grav­i­ty, the so-called “escape veloc­i­ty.” At the Earth­’s sur­face, the escape veloc­i­ty is 25,000 miles per hour, which it why it takes a pret­ty big rock­et to launch a space ship to the moon or planets.

Like a rock­et engine, the Big Bang hurled the galax­ies out­wards; grav­i­ty is pulling them back togeth­er. Do the galax­ies have suf­fi­cient speed to over­come their mutu­al grav­i­ty? Do they pos­sess the escape veloc­i­ty? The ques­tion turns out to be sur­pris­ing­ly dif­fi­cult to answer.

Two things are impor­tant to know: What are present and past expan­sion rates of the galax­ies? And how much mat­ter is act­ing to slow down the expansion?

Dur­ing the past year astronomers have made tan­ta­liz­ing progress towards find­ing answers.

Sev­er­al groups of researchers have been watch­ing super­novas in dis­tant galax­ies. These extreme­ly bright explod­ing stars can be observed bil­lions of light-years away and used as indi­ca­tors of the uni­verse’s chang­ing expan­sion rate.

The reces­sion­al veloc­i­ties of the super­novas can be deduced from a stretch­ing of the wave­lengths of their light, just as the pitch of an auto­mo­bile’s sound is low­ered as it races away from us. The data indi­cate that the expan­sion is not slow­ing down enough to make the galax­ies fall back upon themselves.

The Hub­ble Space Tele­scope has made these obser­va­tions more pre­cise than ever before.

Oth­er groups have been com­par­ing the actu­al dis­tri­b­u­tion of galax­ies to com­put­er mod­els for how the uni­verse should evolve with dif­fer­ent den­si­ties of mat­ter. The best fit between obser­va­tion and cal­cu­la­tion assumes there is not enough mat­ter to stop the expansion.

Appar­ent­ly, the uni­verse will expand forever.

Five bil­lion years from now the sun will swell into a red giant, then col­lapse to a glow­ing ember that will slow­ly fade from sight. A cold, frozen, life­less Earth will cir­cle an extin­guished star.

A hun­dred bil­lion years will pass and the uni­verse will be stretched exceed­ing­ly thin. The last dregs of ener­gy will be squeezed out of star-birthing neb­u­las. No new stars will be born. The sky will grow increas­ing­ly dark.

Some­where, in a last pool of cos­mic warmth, per­haps in a far­away galaxy, a final microbe will expire. Life, which for bil­lions of years had burned among the stars like a cool blue flame, will flick­er out. A dead uni­verse will slide into black oblivion.

Each of us will react to this now like­ly sce­nario in our own way. For myself, I find some­thing grand­ly sedate and dig­ni­fied about such a fin­ish, some­thing that suits my mature mood. No recur­ring fire­balls for me, please. I’m ready for that long, dark cos­mic nap.

Share this Musing: