Delicate balance makes our universe

Delicate balance makes our universe

White lady's-slipper • Photo by Dr. Thomas G. Barnes / USFWS (Public Domain)

Originally published 11 June 1984

The nat­u­ral­ist John Muir said the two great­est expe­ri­ences of his life were camp­ing with Ralph Wal­do Emer­son at Yosemite and find­ing the rare orchid calyp­so bloom­ing alone in a Cana­di­an swamp. Last spring I found a wild orchid as excep­tion­al as a night with Emer­son: a white lady’s-slip­per, soli­tary, snow-pure, alone in a pine woods with 10,000 of its pink cousins. My Peter­son wild­flower guide admits the white vari­ant of the lady’s-slip­per and calls it rare and local. Rare and local, indeed! In my part of New Eng­land I have nev­er seen another.

At least 3 mil­lion and per­haps as many as 10 mil­lion species of life now exist on the sur­face of the Earth. A much greater num­ber exist­ed in the past but have become extinct. This is fruit­ful­ness on a scale some­how unseem­ly for a small plan­et near a back­wa­ter star. What kind of uni­verse is it that so runs riot? What kind of uni­verse will make room for a sin­gle white orchid when 100,000 pink ones are more than enough?

Constants in balance

Con­sid­er these coin­ci­dences, list­ed by Alan McRobert writ­ing in “Sky and Telescope.”

If the so-called fine-struc­ture con­stant that gov­erns atom­ic inter­ac­tions were slight­ly dif­fer­ent from its known val­ue, stars would either burn out very rapid­ly or for­ev­er remain cold and dark. The val­ue of the con­stant is bal­anced like a pen­ny on its edge in such a way that there is a siz­able class of stars (includ­ing the Sun) that will burn with a steady light of bil­lions of years and there­fore nur­ture devel­op­ing life.

If the strong-inter­ac­tion con­stant that gov­erns the force which holds atom­ic nuclei togeth­er were a few per­cent larg­er, pro­tons could not form from their con­stituent quarks and there could be no atoms as we know them. If the con­stant were a few per­cent small­er, the nuclei of all ele­ments heav­ier than heli­um would be unsta­ble and there could be no such thing as a plan­et made of rock and iron and pop­u­lat­ed with car­bon life forms.

If the grav­i­ta­tion­al con­stant dif­fered slight­ly from its observed val­ue, plus or minus, stars could not shine on plan­ets long enough for life to form. If the ratio of the den­si­ty of the ear­ly uni­verse to its expan­sion rate had dif­fered from its assumed val­ue by only one part in 1055 (that’s 1 fol­lowed by 55 zeroes), this uni­verse that began in a “Big Bang” 15 bil­lion years ago would have quick­ly col­lapsed upon itself or bal­looned so rapid­ly that stars and galax­ies could not have formed.

Blake was right to see the world in a grain of sand and heav­en in a wild­flower. Physi­cists believe that car­bon, sil­i­con, oxy­gen and oth­er heavy ele­ments are cre­at­ed by fusion in the cores of stars and dis­persed to space in super­no­va explo­sions. Out of this star­dust new stars and plan­ets form. Adjust the strength of the elec­tro­mag­net­ic force or the nuclear force but slight­ly and you knock out of kil­ter the res­o­nance in the car­bon nucle­us that allows three heli­um nuclei to come togeth­er in the cores of stars to form that element.

The fact that a sin­gle wild­flower exists sets severe con­straints upon the val­ues of the fun­da­men­tal con­stants of physics.

The anthropic principle

The cos­mol­o­gist has raised the improb­a­bil­i­ty of this par­tic­u­lar life-filled uni­verse to a prin­ci­ple, the anthrop­ic prin­ci­ple. The anthrop­ic prin­ci­ple states that since the only uni­verse we could pos­si­bly observe is one that has the prop­er­ties that allow for the appear­ance and evo­lu­tion of life, then this uni­verse must nec­es­sar­i­ly have those properties.

It does indeed appear at first glance as if the uni­verse was designed express­ly for our ben­e­fit. But there is anoth­er way of look­ing at it. The quan­tum physi­cist, when he turns his dis­ci­pline to the physics of the Big Bang, tells us that the equa­tions allow for mul­ti­ple uni­vers­es to pop into exis­tence like bub­bles, an infi­nite num­ber of uni­vers­es spring­ing into exis­tence when the cork is popped in some kind of hyper­space and hyper­time. In every uni­verse phys­i­cal con­stants and con­di­tions assume ran­dom val­ues, and the uni­verse that we know, this uni­verse of sand and wild­flow­ers, is only one of that lim­it­ed class of uni­vers­es that allow for the for­ma­tion of our kind of stars and our kind of mat­ter. The coin is tossed 1055 times and comes down in every pos­si­ble con­fig­u­ra­tion, and our night is just one of 1055 nights, some crammed with stars and life, some for­ev­er dark and life­less, and all but one of which we will nev­er know.

And who am I to say that such things can­not be, when one white orchid takes my breath away?

Share this Musing: