Doom prophets have it wrong — again

Doom prophets have it wrong — again

Detail from "The Last Judgement" by Michelangelo (ca. 1541)

Originally published 24 October 1994

Already we hear of Armaged­don, in super­mar­ket tabloids, pop­u­lar mag­a­zines, and fun­da­men­tal­ist pro­nounce­ments — the first tap-taps of a drum roll of super­sti­tious fer­vor that will grow in inten­si­ty as we approach the end of the mil­len­ni­um, cul­mi­nat­ing in an apoc­a­lyp­tic hul­la­baloo in the last days of the year 1999.

Of course, because there is no year zero, two thou­sand years of the Chris­t­ian cal­en­dar will actu­al­ly have passed at mid­night, Dec. 31 of the year 2000, not at the end of 1999.

But the arith­metic is sim­ply irrel­e­vant. The true pop­u­lar mil­len­ni­um has noth­ing to do with math­e­mat­ics or cal­en­dri­cal sci­ence. We are talk­ing about habits of the human mind, and psy­cho­log­i­cal­ly speak­ing the moment of con­se­quence occurs when the triple nines roll over all at once to become born-again zeros.

It hap­pened once before.

On the last day of the year 999, many Euro­peans anx­ious­ly await­ed the trum­pets to sound and the skies to open. They based their belief on a pas­sage in the Book of Rev­e­la­tions: “And when the thou­sand years are expired, Satan shall be loosed from his prison, and shall go out and deceive the nations.”

Any 10th-cen­tu­ry per­son with a bit of school­ing knew that a thou­sand years from the pre­sumed date of Christ’s birth would not have passed until the last day of the year 1000. But that did­n’t stop the church­es from being full on New Year’s Eve, 999 A.D.

Even the old basil­i­ca of St. Peter’s in Rome was packed with fright­ened wor­shipers wait­ing for the world to end. Pope Sylvester II cel­e­brat­ed mid­night mass. He was not a man inclined to super­sti­tion, but the occa­sion seemed to call for offi­cial acknowl­edge­ment. At the words ite, mis­sa est, (“go, the mass is end­ed”), the bell began to toll. Ter­ri­fied eyes gazed heav­en­ward. Mouths gasped words of con­tri­tion. Limbs shook.

One won­ders if even the Holy Father, one of the most ratio­nal men of his time, did not expe­ri­ence a twinge of cat­a­clysmic anxiety.

Many peo­ple expect­ed the Last Judg­ment to be held in Jerusalem, and thou­sands of pil­grims made the ardu­ous jour­ney to the Holy Lands in antic­i­pa­tion of find­ing a place at Christ’s right hand when the sheep were sep­a­rat­ed from the goats. They wait­ed at the bur­ial place of Jesus as the hour of mid­night approached.

The sand drib­bled through the hour­glass. Nine-hun­dred-and-nine­ty-nine years worth of sand had passed through since day one of the Chris­t­ian era, and now the last grain slipped through the neck. Ite, mil­len­ni­um est (“go, the mil­len­ni­um is end­ed”), the priests might have intoned.

And noth­ing happened.

To be sure, not every­one expect­ed the Day of Wrath. Schol­ars, edu­cat­ed cler­gy, and the upper nobil­i­ty gen­er­al­ly pooh-poohed mil­len­ni­al hys­te­ria as so much superstition.

But those who want­ed to believe that the end of the world was at hand found ample evi­dence for their belief.

Mete­ors, light­ning storms, vol­canic erup­tions, comets, and eclipses were tak­en as signs of the com­ing Armaged­don. Parts of cities burned to the ground. Bril­liant lights appeared in the night sky. It mat­tered to no one that in those days parts of cities burned to the ground almost every year, and that
lights (auro­ras) appeared in the night sky with dull reg­u­lar­i­ty. If one is look­ing for por­tents, nature will always oblige.

The same thing will hap­pen in the run-up to the year 2000. Floods, earth­quakes, famines, and polit­i­cal calami­ties will be offered as auguries of the impend­ing Day of Judg­ment, nev­er mind that floods, earth­quakes, famines, and polit­i­cal calami­ties have always been with us. Coin­ci­dence is the sci­ence of the True Believer.

Accord­ing to all accounts, the scenes of hys­te­ria that accom­pa­nied the last day of the year 999 were not repeat­ed a year lat­er, when the thou­sand years spo­ken of by the Book of Rev­e­la­tions actu­al­ly expired. But let’s face it. It’s not the end of the thou­sandth year that evokes excite­ment; it’s the arrival of the three big goose eggs.

This time around, too, on New Year’s Eve, 1999, throngs of reli­gious mil­lenar­i­ans will be expect­ing trum­pets and heav­en­ly pyrotech­nics. But the less super­sti­tious folks who orga­nize First Night cel­e­bra­tions in Boston and oth­er cities around the coun­try will also pro­vide a grand excess of fun events and man-made fire­works. The rolling-over of the dig­its calls out for recognition.

As the great day approach­es, we’ll hear more and more from stick­lers for accu­ra­cy who will point out the one-year flaw in cal­en­dri­cal log­ic. But who cares? When the young­ster with the New Year’s sash arrives, we want the sash to read 2000, not 2001. Those zeros sug­gest a fresh start, a new begin­ning, a chance to put things right. And the old man with the scythe and the decrepit nines will depart, tak­ing with him anoth­er thou­sand years of our world­ly cares and woes.

Share this Musing: