In search of the soul

In search of the soul

Photo by visuals on Unsplash

Originally published 17 January 1994

Writ­ing about genet­ic exper­i­men­ta­tion in the New York Times, colum­nist Nicholas Wade says, “The secret of life is out: There is no secret, no black box that pro­tects the bio­log­i­cal machin­ery from manip­u­la­tion nor a soul unde­fi­lable in the chemist’s retort.”

The state­ment is shock­ing. There is no secret of life. Our bod­ies are a mess of chem­i­cals. Our minds are elec­tri­cal cir­cuits fir­ing like the chips of computers.

Sci­en­tists have plumbed the human machine and found no ghost, no thing that lingers when the body’s sub­stance turns to dust.

We now under­stand that our genet­ic self is deter­mined by a chem­i­cal code that can be read and amend­ed. Soon, genet­ic engi­neers will be able to add or sub­tract fea­tures both benign and dele­te­ri­ous from our phys­i­cal selves.

Con­scious­ness can be turned on, turned off, altered chemically.

Mem­o­ries can be jogged elec­tri­cal­ly, delet­ed surgically.

The soul as a thing sep­a­rate from the body has been hunt­ed to its lair. The lair is empty.

This may be the most dis­turb­ing sci­en­tif­ic dis­cov­ery of the 20th cen­tu­ry: There is no self unde­fi­lable in the chemist’s retorts.

Most of us were raised to believe in a self that only tem­porar­i­ly resides in a phys­i­cal frame. The self is there at the begin­ning, ful­ly formed, in the fer­til­ized egg. It sur­vives the body’s death and lives for­ev­er. This idea of an imma­te­r­i­al, immor­tal self is among the most cher­ished of human beliefs. We cling to it. We des­per­ate­ly want it to be true.

But where do we find this dis­em­bod­ied self?

In the fer­til­ized human egg there is an arm’s length of DNA, some from each par­ent. DNA is a mol­e­cule with the form of a spi­ral stair­case. The treads of the stair­case are pairs of chem­i­cal units called nucleotides. There are four kinds of treads — des­ig­nat­ed A‑T, T‑A, G‑C, and C‑G by biol­o­gists — alto­geth­er 3 bil­lion steps in the human DNA, a cod­ed recipe for mak­ing a per­son. Soon, biol­o­gists will have a com­plete step-by-step tran­scrip­tion of the code — and the pow­er to change it.

Is this the self we are look­ing for?

What about con­scious­ness? Machines are intel­li­gent, and are becom­ing smarter every day. Already, com­put­ers mim­ic human intel­li­gence with remark­able fideli­ty. When machine intel­li­gence becomes func­tion­al­ly indis­tin­guish­able from human intel­li­gence, will we con­cede that machines are con­scious? Will machines have souls?

Chim­panzees can be taught the use of lan­guage and math­e­mat­i­cal abstrac­tion. Do chimps have souls?

Mem­o­ries? Neu­ro­bi­ol­o­gists have con­vinc­ing­ly demon­strat­ed that mem­o­ries are webs of elec­tro­chem­i­cal con­nec­tions in the brain.

Where then resides the soul? We are hard­ware and soft­ware. We are think­ing meat. We are earth, air and water made con­scious. The self comes into exis­tence slow­ly as cells divide, mul­ti­ply and spe­cial­ize, guid­ed by the DNA, orga­nized by expe­ri­ence. When the orga­ni­za­tion of cells dis­in­te­grates, the self is gone.

We resist. We assert belief in a self that is more than the mere sum of its parts. If to have a soul means any­thing at all, it means to be con­fi­dent in our spe­cial­ness, our unique­ness, our indi­vid­ual sig­nif­i­cance in the cos­mos. It means to believe that the human self is unde­fi­lable and capa­ble of ennobling the universe.

But we should­n’t go look­ing for the soul in the remain­ing nich­es of sci­en­tif­ic igno­rance. Nich­es have a way of becom­ing filled. This much is cer­tain: We will learn more and more about the bio­log­i­cal bases of life and consciousness.

Every per­son will respond to the new sci­en­tif­ic knowl­edge of self in his or her own way. The sum of those respons­es will define our culture.

If our cul­ture is not to be divid­ed against itself, philoso­phers, the­olo­gians, poets, and sci­en­tists must face the chal­lenge of defin­ing the self in a way that is con­sis­tent with sci­ence, respect­ful of reli­gious tra­di­tions, and ele­vat­ing of the human spirit.

I look at the tril­lions of inter­act­ing cells that are my body, the webs of flick­er­ing neu­rons that are my con­scious­ness, and I see a self vast­ly more majes­tic than the pal­try lit­tle soul illus­trat­ed in my grade-school cat­e­chism as a cir­cle besmirched with sin. The more I learn about the machin­ery of life and con­scious­ness, the more pro­found­ly mirac­u­lous the self seems.

As St. Augus­tine said, “There is but one mir­a­cle, and that mir­a­cle is cre­ation.” The secret of life is life itself.

The Judeo-Chris­t­ian Scrip­tures tell us that God cre­at­ed the first man and woman out of the slime of the earth, breathed life into those crea­tures, and pro­nounced his cre­ation good. The myth is con­sis­tent with our cur­rent under­stand­ing of the nature of life. Accord­ing to the best sci­en­tif­ic the­o­ries, we are lit­er­al­ly ani­mat­ed slime. Now we must re-learn to think our­selves “good.”

Share this Musing: