What is the Higgs boson anyway?

What is the Higgs boson anyway?

Computer visualization of a high-energy particle collision • McCauley, Thomas; Taylor, Lucas; for the CMS Collaboration (CC BY-SA 3.0)

Originally published 24 May 1993

Amer­i­can high-ener­gy par­ti­cle physi­cists want $10 bil­lion of the tax­pay­er’s mon­ey to build the Super­con­duct­ing Super­col­lid­er, a colos­sal par­ti­cle-accel­er­at­ing machine in a 50-mile-long tun­nel under the Texas prairie.

Euro­peans physi­cists are ask­ing for mon­ey too. They want to build a Large Hadron Col­lid­er at CERN near Gene­va. The price tag is cheap­er than for the more ambi­tious Amer­i­can machine, but still pricey.

The so-called Holy Grail of both machines is the Hig­gs boson, a mas­sive par­ti­cle named for the British physi­cist who pro­posed its exis­tence as a way of giv­ing a kind of com­ple­tion to the cur­rent the­o­ry of par­ti­cles. The Hig­gs is sup­pos­ed­ly the ulti­mate par­ti­cle, the source of mass of all oth­er par­ti­cles, and the key to unit­ing the forces of nature. Nobel-prizewin­ning physi­cist Leon Led­er­man has called it “the God par­ti­cle.” Steven Wein­berg’s book on the quest for the Hig­gs is called Dreams of a Final Theory.

Britain’s min­is­ter for sci­ence, William Walde­grave, recent­ly issued a chal­lenge at the annu­al con­fer­ence of the Insti­tute of Physics at Brighton, Eng­land: Can physi­cists explain — on a sin­gle sheet of paper — what the Hig­gs boson is, and why it is impor­tant to find it? If so, said Walde­grave, he would help them get the mon­ey. If not, the pub­lic has a right to ask “Why?”

He offered a bot­tle of vin­tage cham­pagne for the best response.

Not one to pass up a free bot­tle of cham­pagne, I offer the fol­low­ing, in verse:

Democritus imagined
a world composed of atoms
bumping in the void
(we are abuzz with them,
he thought). Leucippus
and Lucretius gave assent.
And so it went till Thomson,
Rutherford, and others
discovered nature's trinity---
electrons, protons, neutrons.
How simple! These three
were enough to explain
all that exists. But wait.
As physicists banged
these particles about, others
proliferated like bubbles
in champagne---pions,
muons, neutrinos, quarks,
and so on---a froth of troubles
for searchers of simplicity.
More! Electrons, for example,
interact, repelling. How?
By exchanging photons, Richard
Feynman said. Quarks, too,
get sticky by passing gluons
back and forth (a subtle bit
of Dicky physics, but it worked).
And what of the force called
"weak" between, say, a neutron
and an electron, clearly
not electric. Well, let those
particles too exchange a kind
of anti-glue, called Ws and Zs.
All these---and more---the
physicists found with their
machines (God's plan, it seems,
is not inscrutable to man).
But one, alas! The Higgs,
the heaviest of all, the particle
that passing back and forth
gives all others mass. To make it
will require more energy and purse
than you and I possess.
To make things worse,
no one knows for sure exactly
what the Higgs might be, or if
it exists at all. Lest the physicist's
earnest pleas for funds fall
on unreceptive ears, call
it "the God Particle."
There! Who will deny so grand
a quest: to wrest God's
secret plan from nature's grasp.
Cough up. A billion, please,
or ten. Send those protons
flying on their circumferential
path, to crash, to splatter
a shower of Higgses. Ephemeral,
costly, inconsequential,
yet---a flash, a radiance of mind,
the dream of Democritus
confirmed at last. The Final Theory
(for the time being). What? No cash?
Then share, Mr. Minister,
at least, your bottle of champagne,
perhaps in vino to inspire the folks
in Texas and Geneva (and
Russia and Japan) to find
a cheaper way. The search
for the Higgs boson
goes on.

William Wald­g­reave award­ed bot­tles of cham­pagne for the five best answers to his chal­lenge. The exis­tence of the Hig­gs boson was con­firmed by CERN sci­en­tists in 2012, using the Large Hadron Col­lid­er, built at a cost of over $4 bil­lion. ‑Ed.

Share this Musing: