Nuclear sites: A lethal legacy across the land

Nuclear sites: A lethal legacy across the land

Trinity test, Alamogordo, 1945 • U.S. Department of Energy (Public Domain)

Originally published 30 September 1991

At 5:29 a.m. Moun­tain War Time on July 16, 1945, the world’s first nuclear explo­sion occurred on the Alam­ogor­do bomb­ing range in the desert near White Sands, New Mexico.

A bub­ble of blind­ing light inflat­ed on the hori­zon. With­in sec­onds, a mush­room of roil­ing gas­es rose into the heav­ens. Hur­ri­cane winds blew across the desert floor. Sur­round­ing moun­tains echoed with the roar.

It was impos­si­ble to keep such an explo­sion secret. The shock broke win­dows 120 miles from ground zero. The Army had an expla­na­tion: A muni­tions stor­age dump had acci­den­tal­ly exploded.

Some dump! Some accident!

We found out what actu­al­ly hap­pened 20 days lat­er when a sec­ond bomb explod­ed over Hiroshi­ma, Japan. The news caused a spe­cial stir in East­ern Ten­nessee, where I grew up. For sev­er­al years, we had heard rumors of strange goings on at a place called Oak Ridge, near Knoxville. Now we were told that the enriched ura­ni­um for the Hiroshi­ma bomb had been pro­duced at Oak Ridge, and felt pride that our region had con­tributed so deci­sive­ly to the defeat of Japan.

That sense of achieve­ment had its price.

Deadly pollution

In 1983, the Depart­ment of Ener­gy revealed that over the years since the war, 1,200 tons of tox­ic mer­cury was released into the envi­ron­ment from the nuclear weapons facil­i­ty at Oak Ridge.

More rev­e­la­tions came in 1987: a cat­a­log of dead­ly pol­lu­tions — poly­chlo­ri­nat­ed biphenyls, heavy met­als, radioac­tive par­tic­u­lates and gas­es — released into the air and dumped into the earth. The price of quick vic­to­ry over Japan, and of Amer­i­can secu­ri­ty dur­ing the Cold War with the Sovi­et Union, was a land­scape con­t­a­m­i­nat­ed with tox­ic chem­i­cals and radioac­tive wastes, unfit for plants or ani­mals, a grim geog­ra­phy of death.

And Oak Ridge was­n’t the worst.

This coun­try’s pre­mier nuclear waste­land is the Han­ford Nuclear Reser­va­tion on the Colum­bia Riv­er in Wash­ing­ton state, where the plu­to­ni­um for the Alam­ogor­do test bomb and the Nagasa­ki bomb was pro­duced. For 40 years, Han­ford offi­cials know­ing­ly poi­soned the air and water of that region with radioac­tive gas­es and liq­uids, all the while deny­ing any pub­lic risk.

Today, Han­ford is a sim­mer­ing moon­scape of buried wastes. Some waste tanks are appar­ent­ly in dan­ger of cat­a­stroph­ic explosion.

Oak Ridge, Ten­nessee; Han­ford, Wash­ing­ton; Rocky Flats, Col­orado; Savan­nah Riv­er, South Car­oli­na; Fer­nald, Ohio; Wel­don Spring, Mis­souri; Yuc­ca Flat, Neva­da; Biki­ni and Enewe­tak Atolls, Pacif­ic Ocean: They are the fouled nests of the nuclear animal.

The blight­ed land­scapes of the nuclear age have been record­ed in a bril­liant col­lec­tion of col­or images by pho­tog­ra­ph­er Peter Goin (Nuclear Land­scapes, Johns Hop­kins Uni­ver­si­ty Press, 1991). Goin gained access to the Han­ford plu­to­ni­um pro­duc­tion facil­i­ties, the Neva­da test sites, and the Pacif­ic test sites. By a kind of visu­al mag­ic, his spook­i­ly life­less pho­tographs let us sense what the cam­era can­not see.

The invis­i­ble ema­na­tions. Plants and ani­mals that bear in their tis­sue the tick­ing time bombs of radioac­tive decay. Con­t­a­m­i­nat­ed water, met­al and con­crete. Soil sat­u­rat­ed with the stuff of death. Not a sin­gle human appears in Goin’s bleak land­scapes, and for good rea­son. Even the pho­tog­ra­pher’s brief pres­ence in these places was not with­out risk to himself.

Costly cleanup

The Ener­gy Depart­ment recent­ly pro­posed a 30-year plan to clean up the nuclear mess. The first five years are expect­ed to cost upwards of $40 bil­lion, a stag­ger­ing amount of mon­ey that Con­gress will be reluc­tant to grant. So far, most of the effort has been spent cat­a­loging pol­lut­ed sites, per­haps as many as 3,000 on the Han­ford Reser­va­tion alone.

Thir­ty-four states and Puer­to Rico are affect­ed. No one knows the full extent of the problem.

And what about the Sovi­et Union? If the Cold War left Amer­i­ca in such a mess, imag­ine the prob­lem the Sovi­ets will face when final­ly democ­ra­ti­za­tion and pub­lic scruti­ny pulls aside the cur­tain of secre­cy that has masked more than 40 years of weapons pro­duc­tion and testing.

Of course, there is no such thing as a real solu­tion. Radioac­tive and tox­ic wastes can only be moved to pre­sum­ably safer sites, assum­ing such sites can be found, and with risk to the human work­ers who do the moving.

If we are lucky, the end of the Cold War will slow the awful fren­zy of nuclear weapons pro­duc­tion that has been our species’ shame. But even if pro­duc­tion were stopped com­plete­ly, the plan­et has been fouled for thou­sands of years and bil­lions of dol­lars spent on clean-up won’t change that.

As that first bright bub­ble of nuclear ener­gy swelled to fill the predawn sky in the New Mex­i­co desert 46 years ago, sci­en­tists and their mil­i­tary patrons had already made a mess of things. The mess would get worse with each pass­ing decade.

Robert Oppen­heimer, the father of the atom­ic bomb, watched that morn­ing as the mul­ti-col­ored mush­room rose into the sky, brighter than a thou­sand suns; he thought of a quote from an ancient Hin­du scrip­ture, “I am become Death, the destroy­er of worlds.

Now we must become Life, the clean­er-up of messes.

Share this Musing: