If the key fits, you’ll smell it

If the key fits, you’ll smell it

Photo by Ruslan Zh on Unsplash

Originally published 5 November 1990

An old vaude­ville joke goes like this:

I’ve got a goat with­out a nose.”

You’ve got a goat with­out a nose? How does it smell?”

Awful.”

OK, go ahead and laugh, but I don’t think it’s fun­ny. I’m the goat with­out a nose. Born with­out a sense of smell. Nev­er smelled a rose. Nev­er smelled a piney for­est. Nev­er smelled a goat.

A few years ago Nation­al Geo­graph­ic Mag­a­zine con­duct­ed a smell sur­vey among its read­ers. Six scratch-‘n‑sniff scents were pro­vid­ed in an issue of the mag­a­zine with an invi­ta­tion for read­ers to report what their noses detect­ed. About 1 out of 100 respon­dents report­ed no odors at all, an afflic­tion called total anos­mia. That’s me.

Maybe its because I can’t smell that I keep an eye out for olfac­to­ry research in the sci­en­tif­ic lit­er­a­ture. There’s not much. The aur­al and visu­al sens­es get lots more atten­tion from the psy­chol­o­gists of per­cep­tion, just as they get more atten­tion from nov­el­ists and poets. Smell is appar­ent­ly not ter­ri­bly impor­tant to humans, maybe because our noses are so far from the ground. If hound dogs and fox­es pro­duced poets and psy­chol­o­gists, you can bet their lit­er­a­ture would be full of olfaction.

A bump in the brain

Only neu­rol­o­gists and brain researchers are inclined to give smell its due. It turns out that the olfac­to­ry path­way is a bee-line to the brain. Between the nerve end­ings in the nose that detect scents and the core of the brain there is only a sin­gle synapse, or place where nerve cells join, in a bump at the front of the brain called the olfac­to­ry bulb.

In fact, the 10 mil­lion or so odor detec­tors in the nose are bare nerve end­ings, unlike the oth­er sens­es where there is a kind of mem­brane or win­dow pane between the trans­mit­ting nerves and the out­side world. In a real sense, the inside of the nose is naked brain.

The oth­er end of the olfac­to­ry path­way, deep in the brain, is in close con­tact with the lim­bic sys­tem, the part of the brain involved with emo­tions and mem­o­ry, which in turn con­nects to the glands that con­trol sex, appetite and so on. All of this elab­o­rate sniff­ing cir­cuit­ry is appar­ent­ly very ancient from an evo­lu­tion­ary point of view, but more or less expend­able for humans. A moth needs the sense of smell to find a mate; humans can man­age with­out it.

Odors are just volatile mol­e­cules float­ing in the air, and — as the old vaude­ville joke implies — we emit them as well as detect them. Sev­er­al hun­dred kinds of mol­e­cules have been detect­ed in the gas­es exud­ed by the human body. Most of this stuff, like nitro­gen and car­bon diox­ide, is odor­less. Some of it (ammo­nia) is pun­gent, and some of it (hydro­gen sul­fide) is very much less than pleasant.

No one is com­plete­ly sure how odor mol­e­cules acti­vate olfac­to­ry nerves, but it seems like­ly it’s most­ly a mat­ter a shape. If a mol­e­cule has the right shape to fit the shape of the detec­tor, bin­go, odor. A few dozen types of par­tial anos­mia — spe­cif­ic odor blind­ness — have been detect­ed in humans, so it seems we must have about that many dif­fer­ent shaped key­holes in the nose just wait­ing for the right key. A zig-zag-shaped key­hole detects a fat­ty smell because that’s the shape of fat mol­e­cules. Cam­phor key­holes are star-shaped, jas­mine key­holes are shaped like wrig­gly worms, and so on.

The chem­i­cal com­po­si­tion of odor mol­e­cules seems less impor­tant than their shape. A car­vone mol­e­cule with a right-hand­ed twist smells of spearmint. A car­vone mol­e­cule with a left-hand­ed twist smells of lemon. Same atoms, same mol­e­cules, dif­fer­ent shaped key.

I some­times think about all those tens of mil­lions of mol­e­c­u­lar keys click­ing away in my nose, but noth­ing opens. No feel­ings of lust, appetite, annoy­ance, nos­tal­gia. Noth­ing. And the doc­tors can’t tell me why. I sus­pect the prob­lem is in that relay sta­tion at the front of the brain, the olfac­to­ry bulb, prob­a­bly dam­aged in the trau­ma of birth.

Salamander sensations

A few years ago John Kauer of the Tufts Med­ical School pub­lished an arti­cle in Nature that I read with keen inter­est. Kauer made videos of activ­i­ty in the olfac­to­ry bulb. He took live sala­man­ders and coat­ed their sur­gi­cal­ly-exposed olfac­to­ry bulbs with a volt­age-sen­si­tive dye. Then he elec­tri­cal­ly stim­u­lat­ed the sala­man­der’s olfac­to­ry nerve and filmed the olfac­to­ry bulb with a video cam­era as the dyes react­ed to elec­tri­cal activity.

In a sequence of col­or-cod­ed frames we see the olfac­to­ry bulb in action. Fol­low­ing the stim­u­lus, a lit­tle firestorm of activ­i­ty spreads through the sala­man­der’s olfac­to­ry bulb, ignit­ing and sub­sid­ing. This flare of activ­i­ty flash­es on Kauer’s TV screen. In a thou­sandth of a sec­ond it’s all over, pre­sum­ably hav­ing evoked in the sala­man­der’s brain some pecu­liar­ly sala­man­der­ish appetite or sensation.

If my guess is right, that’s where my own snif­fer goes awry. I would love to invite Kauer to apply his video tech­nique to my olfac­to­ry bulb, so that I might watch as that incip­i­ent fire storm of sig­nal pro­cess­ing is snuffed out by faulty cir­cuits, cir­cuits that were prob­a­bly irre­versibly dam­aged at the very moment I entered into the world of smells.

Share this Musing: